Joining the club? Comparing the emphasis on the Global North and South in the summit diplomacy of South Africa, Brazil, China, and India (1998-2019)
Authors
-
Maria Clara Silva Lage
Universidad Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-4868
-
Rafael Mesquita de Souza Lima
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6042-1606
Abstract
Status is an important factor for the emerging powers of the Global South and they seek to increase their international standing by revising the global hierarchy. At the same time, they must choose among international strategies: to imitate, challenge or follow alternatives of international mobility in relation to the great powers. Faced with this dilemma, how much have emerging powers prioritized the Global South and North over time? Knowing that presidential diplomacy is one of the status markers of the contemporary international system, this study tested the following hypothesis: international organizations from the Global South received, on average, more visits from heads of state/government of emerging powers than other types of organization. We monitored the presidential diplomacy of South Africa, Brazil, China and India between 1998 and 2019. The number of visits by heads of state/government was collected through secondary data bases, the Rising Powers Diplomatic Network and China Visits. The hypothesis was tested through descriptive statistics, generating a stable longitudinal metric to monitor the degree of prioritization between destinations in the North or South by the four countries analyzed. The results indicate that the average number of visits to the Global South was higher for South Africa (59.9% of visits), Brazil (55.7%), China (53.3%), but not for India (44.4%). The findings indicate that emerging powers, in general, prioritized destinations in the Global South in comparison to those in the Global North, validating our working hypothesis.
Keywords:
emerging powers, presidential diplomacy, international status, international organizations, Global SouthReferences
Adebajo, Adekeye (2018) “The Concentric Circles of South Africa’s Foreign Policy.” In: Adebajo, Adekeye; Virk, Kudrat (Ed.) Foreign Policy in Post-Apertheid South Africa, London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd, pp. 1-50.
Bava, Salma (2010). “India: Foreign policy strategy between interests and ideas.” In: Flemes, Daniel (Ed.) Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Germany: Routledge, pp. 113-127.
Betz, Joachim (2010). “India: The Interaction of Internal and External Factors in Foreign Policy.” In: Flemes, Daniel (Ed.) Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Germany: Routledge, pp. 237-254.
Brown, Kerry. (2017) China's World: What Does China Want?, London: I.B. Tauris.
Chaouad, Robert (2016). “Émergence: genèse et circulation d’une notion devenue catégorie d’analyse” Revue internationale et stratégique, v. 3, n. 103, pp. 55-66. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-revue-internationale-et-strategique-2016-3-page-55.htm.
Cooper, Andrew (2021). “China, India and the pattern of G20/BRICS engagement: differentiated ambivalence between ‘rising’ power status and solidarity with the Global South” Third World Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1945-1962. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1829464.
Danese, Sérgio (2017). Diplomacia Presidencial. Brasília: Editora FUNAG.
Duque, Marina (2018). “Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 577–592. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy001.
Flemes, Daniel (2010). “Brazil: Strategic Options in the Changing World Order.” In: Flames, Daniel (Ed.) Regional Leadership in the
Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Germany: Routledge, pp. 93-112.
Geldenhuys, Deon (2010). “South Africa: The Idea-driven Foreign Policy of a Regional Power” In: Flemes, Daniel (Ed.) Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Germany: Routledge, pp. 151-167.
Gilpin, Robert (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godoy, Jhonathan; Silva Lage, Maria Clara. (2022). “Presidential diplomacy: an analysis of the Indo-African relationship and of Africa as a priority in Indian foreign policy.” Fronteira: Revista de iniciação científica de Relações Internacionais, vol. 21, no. 41, pp. 106-134. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/fronteira/article/view/26856.
Ikenberry, John G. (2017). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jagtiani, Sharinee; Hoffman, Clemens; Prs-Hansen, Miriam; Bilgic, Ali (2022). “G20: The Global South’s New Status-Seeking Platform?” GIGA Focus Global, n. 7, pp. 1-10. Acessado em 22/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.57671/gfgl-22072.
Ji, Xianbai (2022). “How Global Summitry Evolves: The Complementary Multilateralism Perspective.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 15, p. 289–312. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac011.
Krapohl, Sebastian; Meissner, Katharina; Muntschick, Johannes (2014). “Regional Powers as Leaders or Rambos? The Ambivalent Behaviour of Brazil and South Africa in Regional Economic Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 52, no. 4. pp. 879–895. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12116.
Lake, David (2009). Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
Larionova, Marina; Shelepov, Andrey (2022) “BRICS, G20 and global economic governance reform.” International Political Science Review, v. 43, n. 4, pp. 512-530, Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121211035122.
Larson, Deborah; Shevchenko, Alexei (2014). “Managing Rising Powers: The Role of Status Concerns.” In: Paul, T.V.; Wohlforth, William; Larson, Deborah (Eds.) Status in World Politics. 1st edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-57.
MacFarlane, S (2006). “The ‘R’ in BRICs: is Russia an emerging power?” International Affairs, vol. 82, n. 1, pp. 41–57. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00514.x.
Malamud, Andrés (2011) “A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy.” Latin American Politics and Society, v. 53, n. 3, p. 1-24. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x.
Mesquita, Rafael; Chien, Jia (2021) “Do regional powers prioritize their regions? Comparing Brazil, South Africa and Turkey,” Third
World Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 7, p. 1544-1565. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1898280.
Mesquita, Rafael; Seabra, Pedro (2022) “Severity, salience, and selectivity: understanding the varying responses to regional crises by Brazil and South Africa” International Politics, early view. 2022. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-022-00392-x.
Milani, Carlos; Pinheiro, Letícia; Soares de Lima, M. R. (2017). “Brazil’s foreign policy and the ‘graduation dilemma’.” International Affairs, vol. 93, no. 3, p. 585–605. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix078.
Montenegro, Renan (2019) “Uma Visão Geral da Política Externa Chinesa Contemporânea: Estratégias, Atores e Instrumentos.” Brazilian Journal of International Relations, Marília, v. 8, n. 2, p. 297-329. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjir/article/view/8931.
Paes, Lucas de Oliveira; Cunha, André M.; Fonseca, Pedro C. (2017) “Narratives of Change and Theorisations on Continuity: the Duality of the Concept of Emerging Power in International Relations.” Contexto Internacional, v. 39, n. 1, p. 75–95. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2017390100004.
Paul, T.V.; Wohlforth, William; Larson, Deborah (2014) “Status and World Order.” In: Paul, T.V.; Wohlforth, William; Larson, Deborah (Eds.) Status in World Politics. 1st edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-29.
Reitano, Richard (2019). “Multilateral Diplomacy, Summits, and the United Nations.” In: Muldoon Jr.; James P.; Avel, JoAnn F.; Reitano, Richard; Sullivan, Earl (Eds.) Multilateral Diplomacy and the United Nations Today. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 231-239.
Rodrigues, Pietro; Urdinez, Francisco; Oliveira, Amâncio. (2019). “Measuring International Engagement: Systemic and Domestic Factors in Brazilian Foreign Policy from 1998 to 2014.” Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 370–391. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orz010.
Saraiva, Miriam G.; Briceño-Ruiz, José (2009). “Argentina, Brasil e Venezuela: as diferentes percepções sobre a construção do Mercosul.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 149-166. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292009000100008.
Secches, Daniela V.; Vadell, Javier A.; Ramos, Leonardo (2020) “Potências médias e potências emergentes na economia política internacional: uma aproximação teórico-conceitual.” Sociedade e Cultura, v. 23, e59666. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://revistas.ufg.br/fcs/article/view/59666.
Stuenkel, Oliver. (2022) “How Brazil embraced informal organizations.” International Politics, early view. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-022-00385-w.
Wang, Yu; Stone, Randall W. (2022) “China visits: a dataset of Chinese leaders’ foreign visits” The Review of International Organizations, early view. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-022-09459-z.
Weinhardt, Clara; Schöfer, Till (2022) “Differential treatment for developing countries in the WTO: the unmaking of the North–South distinction in a multipolar world.” Third World Quarterly, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 74-93. Acessado em 19/12/2022 em https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1992271.
Twitter