Physical Quantities as Relations in Third Analogy of Experiencia

Authors

Abstract

An interpretation of the Third Analogy of Experience (Kant, KrV A211/B256–A218/B265) is proposed, from which the metaphysical question referring to the relational or intrinsic character of the properties that represent physical quantities is discerned, in the context of what is called a critical ontology. It is obtained that, as a result of the a priori rules corresponding to the Analogies of Experience, the determinations of objects have a relational character. This result is consistent with the view of time and space obtained in relational formulations of certain physical theories and with relationalist approaches to time and space in the philosophy of physics.

Keywords:

critical ontology, Kant, physical relationalism, relational properties, time

Author Biography

Matías Daniel Pasqualini, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Becario doctoral de Conicet (Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas). Doctorando en la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Licenciado en Filosofía por la Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Áreas de especialización: filosofía de la física, metafísica de la ciencia.

References

Armstrong, D. M. (1988). Are Quantities Relations? A Reply to Bigelow and Pargetter. Philosophical Studies, 54(3), 305-316.

Barbour, J. (1999). The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics. Oxford UP.

___. (2009). The Nature of Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3489.

Barbour, J. B., y Bertotti, B. (1982). Mach’s Principle and the Structure of Dynamical Theories. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 382(1783), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1982.0102.

Bigelow, J., y Pargetter, R. (1988). Quantities. Philosophical Studies, 54(3), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646273.

___. (1991). Science and Necessity. Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551611.

Huggett, N., Hoefer, C., y Read, J. (2022). Absolute and Relational Space and Motion: Post-Newtonian Theories. En Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/spacetime-theories/.

Jáuregui, C. (2016). Acción recíproca y unidad necesaria de la experiencia. Sobre la interpretación de E. Watkins del modelo causal kantiano. Tópicos, 52, 403-426 https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i52.799.

Kant, I. (2007). Crítica de la razón pura. Trad. Mario Caimi. Colihue.

___. (1968). Kants Werke. Akademie Textausgabe. Walter de Gruyter.

___. (1989). Principios metafísicos de la ciencia de la naturaleza. Trad. Carlos Másmela. Alianza.

Morrison, M. (1998). Community and Coexistence: Kant’s Third Analogy of Experience. Kant-Studien, 89(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1998.89.3.257.

Olson, M. J. (2010). The Intuition of Simultaneity: Zugleichsein and the Constitution of Extensive Magnitudes. Kant-Studien, 101(4), 429-444. https://doi. org/10.1515/kant.2010.027.

Paton, H. J. (1936). Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience, vol. 2. Allen and Unwin.

Watkins, E. (2005). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge UP.